Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE" Results 561 - 580 of 2,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
” Appeals Authorization; Conditions to Institute Class ActionL’Oratoire Saint Joseph du Mont Royal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by MARK GREAVES, MATRIX CHAMBERS
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, heard 12-13 Jun 2019. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
  Coincidentally, Blackbeard named his ship for the same Queen Anne who gave royal consent to the first British copyright act, the Statute of Anne, in 1710. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:57 am by INFORRM
In advance of tomorrow’s eagerly awaited Supreme Court “serious harm” decision in Lachaux v Independent Print, the latest Judicial Statistics show, for the second year running, a substantial increase in the number of issued defamation claims. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:00 am by Denise Gan (Toronto)
“Best Interests of the Corporation” – more than solely shareholder interests Bill C-97 aims to consolidate the law on the fiduciary duty of directors and officers by codifying the Supreme Court’s findings in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders (BCE). [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am by UKSC Blog
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am by Saskia Hayes, CMS
Saskia also acted for a number of insurers in responding to, and appearing before, the Australian Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
These amendments received Royal Assent through Bill C-14 on June 17, 2016, through what is now called Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:45 am by FM Librarian
If you are not familiar with Open Access, please visit my other blog for an introduction.Green Open Access [info]"The Ambiguous Authority of a ‘Surrogate State’: UNHCR’s Negotiation of Asylum in the Complexities of Migration in Southeast Asia," Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales (Forthcoming, 2019) - The postprint version of this article is currently under embargo. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
Evans v Fleri (2019) EW Misc 12 (CC) A lesson in drafting from Wales. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:28 am by Giesela Ruehl
Practical implications of the Supreme Court decision The ruling of the Supreme Court in Vedanta has been already called the“the most important judicial decision in the field of business and human rights since the jurisdictional ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum in 2013”. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:35 pm by Jim Walker
The Bahamas is a flag state where many hundreds of cruise ships are registered. [read post]
Issues for the Supreme Court In considering the appeal, the Supreme Court addressed the following issues: whether there had been an abuse of EU law by the claimants in relying on Article 4 of the Brussels Regulation Recast to establish jurisdiction over Vedanta as anchor defendant for the purpose of attracting the English courts’ jurisdiction over the claim against KCM, “the real targets of the claim”; whether the claimants’ pleaded case and supporting evidence disclosed no… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]