Search for: "Regina" Results 561 - 580 of 1,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2009, 1:48 am
Regina (Age UK) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Equality and Human Rights Commission and Another intervening) Queen’s Bench Division “Provisions permitting an employer to require retirement at the age of 65 were justified where he could show that the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim since the government had [...] [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:00 am by sally
Regina (Vodafone Ltd and Others) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Office of Communications and Others, interested parties Case C-58/08 Court of Justice of the European Union “No principles of European Union law were infringed in capping charges made by mobile telephone operators to customers for calls made outside their home state but within the Community. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 3:11 am
Whether jury can be trusted Regina (Bennett) v Inner South London Coroner, Officers A and B and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, interested parties “While facts were for the jury, coroners were entitled to consider whether it was safe to leave a particular verdict on the evidence to the jury. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:26 am by sally
Regina (Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and others intervening) [2010] EWCACiv 1094; [2010] WLR (D) 251 “Legal advice privilege applied only to advice given by a member of the legal profession. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:29 am by sally
Regina (Elam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 29; [2012] WLR (D) 14 “The licence expiry date applicable to a prisoner serving consecutive terms of imprisonment including at least one term of 12 months or more was to be determined by the provisions of section 264(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 unless all the offences for which the sentences were imposed had been committed before section 264 came into force on 4 April 2005; in such a case, section 37(1) of the… [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 am by sally
Regina (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1359; [2011] WLR (D) 340 “The 14-day period allowed to a detained mental patient to lodge an application with the Mental Health Review Tribunal as provided by section 66 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and rule 32(1) the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 was not to be considered to have expired where, though sent by fax on the last working day within… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:20 am
Regina (Thames Water Utilities Ltd) v Bromley Magistrates' Court (Water Services Regulation Authority intervening) [2008] EWHC 1763 (QB); [2008] WLR (D) 264 “Sewage escaping from pipes maintained by a statutory undertaker was "controlled waste" within the meaning of s 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:12 am by traceydennis
Regina (Hope and Glory Public House Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court (Westminster City Council intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 31; [2011] WLR (D) 20 “Although an appeal to a magistrates’ court from the decision of a local authority’s licensing committee was a full rehearing on all the evidence the committee’s decision was a relevant matter to be taken into consideration and should only be reversed if the judge was satisfied that the original decision… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:27 am by tracey
Regina v Ideal Waste Paper Co Ltd and others: [2011] WLR (D)  370 “The absence of guidance relating to the permissible levels of contamination of waste which could legally be exported did not render criminal proceedings an abuse of process on grounds that the charges were so imprecise as to offend the requirements of the common law and of article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning accessibility and certainty… [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:56 am
Regina (TNT Post UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Royal Mail Group Ltd, interested party) Case C-357/07 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The Royal Mail was exempt from value-added tax as a supplier of public postal services, except for supplies of goods or services whose terms had been individually negotiated. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:18 am by Sean Tucker
Written by Professor Sean Tucker, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Regina In 2021, the Regina… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by Rebecca Anderson
The Penn Program on Documentaries and the Law, directed by Professor Regina Austin L'73, combines the study and production of documentary videos with legal education at Penn Law. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:20 am by sally
Regina (Maxwell) v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2011] EWCA Civ 1236; [2011] WLR (D) 307 “Although a complaint of disability discrimination was an eligible complaint to be made to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (“OIA”) under the Higher Education Act 2004, the task and duty of the OIA on a complaint of disability discrimination against a higher education institution was confined to whether the conduct of the… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:43 am by sally
Regina v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48; [2011] WLR (D) 238 “When the Court of Appeal quashed a conviction and then exercised its discretion under section 7 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 to order a retrial of the defendant, that decision should not be upset on appeal unless it could be shown that it was plainly wrong in that it was one which no reasonable court could have made or that it took into account immaterial factors or failed to consider material factors. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:57 am by tracey
Regina v S(C): [2012] EWCA Crim 389;  [2012] WLR (D)  54 “Where the purpose of a legislative scheme was to ensure that a child could be subject to the protection of the court, there would be no defence of necessity available in respect of the offence of removing a child from the jurisdiction of England and Wales.” WLR Daily, 29th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:08 am by sally
Regina v B [2012] WLR (D) 56 “For the purposes of quashing an acquittal on the ground that there was new evidence not adduced before the court in the proceedings in which the person was acquitted, evidence which had been available to be used in those proceedings but had not been used might be new evidence for those purposes.” WLR Daily, 29th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:41 am by tracey
Regina v James and another; [2011] EWCA Crim 2991;  [2011] WLR (D)  389 “Expenditure on scales, machinery parts, rent and wages for casual workers were not sums obtained as a result of or in connection with criminal conduct, in this case the evasion of excise duty on tobacco products, and therefore did not amount to a benefit from criminal conduct for the purposes of section 76(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.” WLR Daily, 21st December 2011 Source:… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by tracey
Regina v Court and another: [2012] EWCA Crim 133;  [2012] WLR (D)  27 “The ingredients of the common law offence of keeping a disorderly house required that the services provided were open to members of the public and were of such a character and conducted in such a manner that their provision amounted to an outrage to public decency. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:41 am by sally
Regina v Boggild and others [2011] WLR (D) 237 “An appeal by the prosecution under section 14A(5A) of the Football Spectators Act 1989 against a failure by a court to make a football banning order fell to be considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) because no provision in that Act or elsewhere allocated the jurisdiction to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:42 am by sally
Regina v Jones and another [2011] WLR (D) 270 “When a person deposited material on land the question whether the material constituted ‘waste’ for the purposes of section 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 depended on that person’s conduct immediately prior to depositing the material and the landowner’s purpose in receiving it. [read post]