Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 561 - 580 of 6,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2022, 9:09 am by Hyemin Han
Khashoggi’s fiancée, Hatice Cengiz, brought CENGIZ et al v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:57 am by Kader Kadem
The fact that the prosecutor stood on a raised platform in the courtroom did not infringe the principle of equality of arms.In today’s Chamber judgment in the case Diriöz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:35 pm by Howard Knopf
The result is hardly surprising - though the nature and depth of the reasoning will no doubt be of great interest to copyright and administrative law types.This was a very rich decision in terms of jurisprudence, harkening back to Roncarelli v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:35 pm by Howard Knopf
The result is hardly surprising - though the nature and depth of the reasoning will no doubt be of great interest to copyright and administrative law types.This was a very rich decision in terms of jurisprudence, harkening back to Roncarelli v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
When the judge denied his request for relief, an appeal followed.On its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, reiterated that the discretion of the Department of Motor Vehicles was quite “broad,” and that its determination could not be modified in the absence of some “violation of lawful procedure, … error of law, or was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
COMMISSION DENIED IN ABSENCE OF AN AGREEMENTRecently, the Appellate Division, Second Department, issued a ruling that reiterated the importance of securing a contract (or some agreement) if you’re a real-estate broker looking to make a commission on a transaction.In Commercial Realty Services v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:06 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Short answer: yes.Burk does not have kind words for either the Federal Circuit or the Supreme Court, and he reiterates his prior criticism of developments like the gDNA/cDNA distinction in Myriad. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
" [56 RCNY 1-05 [b][6]].Because it agreed with OATH that a pushcart fell within the “display stand” definition, the AD1didn’t think the agency’s findings were “arbitrary and capricious or affected by an error of law, but was instead rational and entitled to deference,” and thus opted to deny the challenge and confirmed the underlying determination.Sadly, there’s no pushing back on that ….# # #DECISIONMatter of M. v New York City Off. of… [read post]