Search for: "Rice v. Rice" Results 561 - 580 of 1,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2016, 8:02 am by Claire Darbourne and guestauthor
One of the prisoners accidentally dropped a sack of rice on Mrs Cox and injured her. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:29 pm by Aimee Hess
The Texas Supreme Court recently granted a petition for review in the case of Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
Moreover, according to the defendant's own submissions by reference to Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, it is a principle which enables the court to modify the parties' substantive rights in order to achieve what it regards as a just solution in the particular case I conclude, therefore, that the defendant cannot rely on principles of estoppel to avoid liability in this case. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
” Concrete Machinery, 843 F.2d at 606 (1st Cir. 1988); Rice v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:59 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Hence the Popular People’s Front of Judea v. the People’s popular front of Judea. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
There was evidence instead that Dank supplied “BB Formula” to Cronulla, which the club doctor stated was recommended “for animal treatment only” and described as “a unique rice bran extract emulsion. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
The authors also provide a rich analysis of the legal challenges to martial law that culminated in Duncan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:24 am by Zack Bluestone
On Wednesday, the United States and the European Union warned Beijing that it must respect the upcoming merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm by Daily Record Staff
Environmental law — Voluntary Cleanup Program — Private cause of action Appellants Ruth Sherrill, Sherry Moore-Edmonds, Elizabeth Arnold, Merab Rice, Tim Bull, and Julia Dinkins (collectively, “Appellants”) filed suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City seeking a declaratory judgment, mandamus, and a permanent injunction against any construction activities on several lots of waterfront property ... [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
For those of you wondering, Justice Scalia voted for tribal interests in Holyfield, Potawatomi (presumably on the immunity issue alone), Sac and Fox (Bill Rice’s case), Kiowa, Arizona v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:47 am by Sarah M Donnelly
 He was a tireless advocate for Indian tribes and Indian peoples, successfully arguing on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the United States Supreme Court in Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]