Search for: "Risk v. Wells Market Service, Inc." Results 561 - 580 of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Universal Health Services, 974 P.2d 1158, 1159-60 (Nev. 1999); Packard v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Unfortunately, when negotiations between the parties break down, letters of intent are often at the center of litigation.[2] In perhaps the most famous example of litigation around the enforceability of a letter of intent, Pennzoil won a judgment against Texaco for $10.5 billion, and Texaco was forced to seek bankruptcy protection.[3] Despite the legal risks, companies continue to use letters of intent. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
However, in the case of its response to the Copyright Office’s NOI on Artificial Intelligence and Copyright, the FTC has submitted Comments that are unclear and thus open to a variety of interpretations—and possibly to misinterpretations as well. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Starting on the rail is AEP Energy Services v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Many, at best, pay lip service to the Arthur Andersen fee factors, or at least some of them. [read post]
22 May 2022, 8:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background Octo offers a variety of cybersecurity products and services. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The current market turmoil will only exacerbate these litigation risks. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
[#Energy/Ethanol] Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Interestingly, even though in dissent, Judge Bryson agreed that the "Supreme Court's recent decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]