Search for: "Robert Ginsburg"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2020, 3:40 pm
” Six of the nine current justices, including Ruth Bader Ginsburg (87), Stephan Breyer (81), Clarence Thomas (71), Samuel Alito (70), John Roberts (65) and Sonia Sotomayor (65), are over 60 and thus fall into the population that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) has deemed most susceptible to contracting the virus. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:44 am
Ginsburg and Alito have written the most majority opinions, with three each, and Ginsburg has written more dissents than any other justice, with three. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
Following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s guidelines for COVID-19, and in a departure from tradition, only Chief Justice John Roberts was in the justices’ conference room again last week, with the rest of the justices participating remotely by telephone. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court building is now closed to the public and oral arguments have been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but much of the work of the high court goes on. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
Roberts, however, is an infrequent dissent author and an even less frequent concurrence author. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:40 pm
He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 4:10 am
Robert H. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Richard Lazarus in connection with Lazarus’ new book, “The Rule of Five: Making Climate History at the Supreme Court” (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2020). [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 12:40 pm
” Two of the justices are in their eighties: Justice Stephen Breyer is 81, while Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be 87 next week. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:59 am
” Schumer proceeded to dig in and even blast Roberts personally for the criticism. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
Chuck Schumer Needs to Watch Himself By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps writes that Chuck Schumer’s recent statement about Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch was dangerous and should be condemned, but that Chief Justice John Roberts’ response should also have defended Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg against Donald Trump’s attacks. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:34 am
Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil M. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:21 am
“For Justice Roberts to follow the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Senator Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes,” he said. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
” Ginsburg says. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:10 pm
As neither Roberts nor Thomas was in dissent in Hernández or McKinney, Ginsburg assigned those dissents to herself. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
” As Stewart’s argument wound down, Ginsburg turned to the question of net profits, asking Stewart whether he could defend the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:54 am
Should the Court reach the merits of the constitutional question, Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kavanaugh, Alito, and Gorsuch seem likely to conclude that the removal provision is unconstitutional while Justices Ginsburg, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer would likely take the opposite position. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:28 am
Wall resisted Ginsburg’s contention that the 30-mile requirement serves no purpose. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Before Kneedler could respond, Chief Justice John Roberts broke in, noting that Kneedler had been trying to argue why Manuf v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that “[i]t’s hard to overstate what a decision about this law … will reveal about this Supreme Court and its jurisprudence on what remains one of the nation’s most politically divisive topics. [read post]
