Search for: "Robert S. Crawford" Results 561 - 580 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2007, 8:15 pm
CRAWFORD: That's what a Hollywood career will do for you, I guess. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:11 pm
  In the May post, I reported that Springsteen's conviction had been overturned because prosecutors introduced portions of Scott's confession at Springsteen's trial without giving Springsteen the chance to cross-examine Scott, a practice now outlawed by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990):IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:17 pm
The New York Times editorial board and Slate’s Emily Bazelon don’t think so. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:49 am
Writes Jan Crawford Greenburg:The White House is not expecting a retirement, but it wants to be ready if a surprise announcement occurs, sources said.It's widely considered that the most likely candidates for retirement are liberal Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, although both have said emphatically that they do not plan to step down.... [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Finally, Rick Hasen has this post at Election Law Blog about a forthcoming cert. petition in Crawford, the Indiana voter ID case. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
Addition: Jan Crawford Greenburg also posted this entry on her Legalities blog saying that the Court should not be described as the "Kennedy Court" but rather that "it's the Roberts Court vs. the Stevens Court. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 am
Greenburg portrays Stevens and Roberts in an epic struggle, and she says Roberts will win, and he will win because of Kennedy isn't the type to hold to the middle. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:49 am
A final point: The acerbity of Roberts's dissent suggests that he may be giving up on his professed desire to overcome the fragmentation of the current Court. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:56 pm
Yesterday, WBUR's "On Point" featured this audio segment, a discussion on the Roberts Court after the abortion decision with guests Jan Crawford Greenburg, Jeffrey Rosen and Karen Tumulty. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 7:58 am
"The Roberts' Court": Yesterday's broadcast of the public radio program "On Point" featured as guests ABC News correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg, Law Professor Jeffrey Rosen, and Time magazine national political correspondent Karen Tumulty. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:52 pm
Fueled by the success of the bestselling, critically acclaimed Supreme Conflict, Jan Crawford Greenburg -- ABC News's young, talented, and utterly gorgeous Supreme Court correspondent -- is challenging Greenhouse for the title of America's top Supreme Court reporter. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:21 am
This ruling lends support to those who predict -- like Jan Crawford Greenburg, in Supreme Conflict -- that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito will move the Court significantly to the right in the years ahead. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:45 am
" Online at The American Prospect, Scott Lemieux has this review of Jan Crawford Greenburg's book, "Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 4:03 am
If Roberts joins in a majority opinion striking down the policies of those two school systems, every Roberts-besotted writer who seems him as committed to "restraint" and reducing conflict on the Court should engage in a public apology.Among such writers is Jan Crawford Greenburg, whose new book Supreme Conflict, though an enjoyable read, is marred by the lack of any real analysis of some of her arguments. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 8:00 am
Join Supreme Court experts Jeffrey Rosen and Jan Crawford Greenburg for a revealing Citizens' Constitutional Conversation about the nation's highest court. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:31 am
Powerful lawmakers past and present are on its payroll, including House Speaker Patrick Bauer, former Senate President Pro Tem Robert Garton and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman William Crawford. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:05 pm
Mary Wood has this news release on Jan Crawford Greenburg's remarks at the University of Virginia Law School last Friday (via How Appealing). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:32 am
Roberts, 448U.S. 56 (1980), which is now discarded, but the Craig majority opinion reflects a balancing approach to the confrontation right, reflective both of the Roberts era and of Justice O'Connor, while Crawford reflects a more categorical approach favored by its author.There can be little doubt that Justice Scalia, whose Craig dissent was bitter and pungent, would like to see that decision overruled. [read post]