Search for: "Roberts v. Superior Court" Results 561 - 580 of 1,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2018, 5:46 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 11:02 am
Robert Howard and Lynn Howard, et al., a 12-page opinion on a petition for rehearing, Judge Robb writes:We grant the petition for rehearing, vacate our earlier decision, and consider the merits of the issue raised by INDOT's appeal: whether the trial court properly set aside its prior entry of summary judgment. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Lord Chancellor was reported to have said that the criticism by Sir Robert, if correctly attributed, was “manifestly a ridiculous exaggeration”. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:45 pm by Scott W Lawrence
Lytle timely appealed the revocation to the Spokane County Superior Court, properly serving notice on the DOL. ? [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
In reviewing the fee request, though, Orange County Superior Court Judge Robert Moss said he found the 228.7 hours of work for the pretrial motion and the 410 hours on the appeal to be excessive. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am by Dwight Sullivan
As the Navy-Marine Corps Court has helpfully summarized:  Our superior court has noted that “Articles 92 and 86(1) of the Code may overlap in certain situations involving reporting for military duty. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:06 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al, Superior Court of Pennsylvania, No. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
John Rogers and Thompson & Rogers (NFP) NFP criminal opinions today (8) (link to cases): Robert Goldsberry v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:46 am by Beth Graham
Jurden, President Judge of the Superior Court of Delaware, the Hon. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:33 pm by Ryan Bowers
On December 22, 2010, the court handed down Robert Neises Construction Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Two years later, in 2009, the Supreme Court held in Ashcroft v. [read post]