Search for: "Rock v. Marks"
Results 561 - 580
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 3:05 am
"The Constitution is the rock upon which our nation rests," Kaplan wrote on issuing his decision. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
Even Pop Rocks® Crackling Candy has not been safe from the vagaries of the false marking bounty hunters! [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of VICCINO’S & Design over IL VICINO for restaurant services (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Ansel Adams Publishing Trust – Ansel Adams and trademark fair use – Publishing Trust files suit to prevent Rick Norsigian from selling photos it claims were taken by Adams (IP Law Blog) Hard Rock Cafe – Hard Rock Café trademark issues: not too happy about free publicity (Trademark Blog of the… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:56 am
Today’s oral argument in Texarkana marks only the eleventh time in modern times that the Arkansas Supreme Court has held court away from Little Rock. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 10:43 am
In the 2009 case of State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
(TTABlog) District Court N D Illinois: Competitition alone not enough for Sherman Act or tortious interference: OpticsPlanet v OpticSale (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Hard Rock Cafe – Why you don’t allow assignments of trademark license agreements: Hard Rock Cafe Int’l (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:51 am
The Supreme Court held in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 3:41 am
Chong warned advertisers to be careful in buying competitor's trade mark keywords following the Google AdWords case. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Last Friday was Constitution Day, a day when, by law, every educational institution receiving federal funds has to educate its students about the constitution (Ruthann Robson, Constitutional Law Prof Blog). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
To borrow another phrase from the realm of science (Wolfgang Pauli, this time), some opinions are so far off the mark, not only are they not right, they’re not even wrong. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
This is not any old scarf as it will be imprinted with excerpts from the 1949 Registered Designs Act, the 1994 Trade Marks Act or the 1977 Patents Act. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:34 am
To show the halting development of judicial review he discusses Marbury, the Cherokee cases, Dred Scott, the Little Rock crisis, and Bush v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:55 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm
Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past 65 years, I’m sure you are familiar with Dairy Queen’s delicious “Blizzard” ice cream confections. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 1:58 pm
V. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
The subject of this little rant was the dispute in Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
The Glad Products Company et al (Docket Report) Simonian - False patent marking standing motion decided without briefing: Simonian v. [read post]
