Search for: "Rodriguez v Grant"
Results 561 - 580
of 769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 3:15 am
Rodriguez, 269 Kan. 633, 643-644 (2000). [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, pet. ref'd) (citing Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Following High Court Cue, 2nd Circuit Cancels Habeas Grant
New York Law Journal
Convicted cocaine dealer Jose Rodriguez thought he was in the clear after the 2nd Circuit ordered that his habeas petition be granted because the trial judge had restricted his family's access to his trial. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:31 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
Rodriguez, 371 N.C. 295, 316, 814 S.E.2d 11, 26 (2018); State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 35 (1973). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Rodriguez (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Which one of these four mere descriptiveness refusals did the Board reverse? [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
The Court is singing only sad songs this week, because once again we have no new grants to tell you about. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The Court on Monday also granted certiorari in Henry Skinner v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
Rodriguez-Moreno, 273 Or. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:20 am
In the other case in which the Court granted review on Monday, Jennings v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am
Rodriguez (1973)—that wealth is not a suspect classification triggering strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:31 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:47 am
See my discussion of last year’s Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am
and Auer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm
Rodriguez-Rivera v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
” In Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Co. for Life & Health Ins. v. [read post]
