Search for: "Rome v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2020, 4:38 am
Trattamento Rifiuti Metropolitani (Lis Pendens and Conflicting Choice of Court Agreements in BNP Paribas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
Restaurant v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The review examines the overall state of the domestic news market, its financial sustainability, the role of digital advertising and social media. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
” Roadcap v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:40 pm
The Administration of Haider al Abadi is worried that renewed sectarian tensions could unravel its fight against the Islamic State, forcing the country into an impossible balancing act between the United States, Iran, and Sunni Tribal fighters battling ISIS. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:30 pm
Otto v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
In essence, the French legislator was aware that technical regulations, which could potentially place additional burdens on importers from other Member States according to the dual burden doctrine (Barnard, p. 87). [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
Florence responded by sending ambassadors to Rome to confer with the pope. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 6:38 am
ItalyFacebook v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Italy Italy’s data protection authority Garante has fined Rome’s city council and third-party property management firm Ama a combined €415,000 over privacy violations related to sensitive data breaches of individuals who have undergone abortions. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am
(See paragraph 135 et seq of the ICJ’s 2015 Judgment in Croatia v Serbia.) [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
First, in Marley v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
(d) of the Rome Statute might have something more to say about Finnis’ solution. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
United States Gawker Media has filed for bankruptcy after losing the Hulk Hogan invasion-of-privacy case. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
(v) If the answer to paragraph (iv) is in the affirmative, does Article 10 of Directive 2006/115 permit Member States to exempt hotel operators from the obligation to pay ‘a single equitable remuneration’ on the grounds of ‘private use’ within the meaning of Article 10(1)(a) of Directive 2006/115? [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
The last is that of post-colonial and post-imperial national orders brought to its current state of expression in the bodies of states liberated from the formal domination of other states a lifetime ago (measured by the life span of a human) and expressed through the magisterium of that is the constant state of oppression against which all national existence is gauged. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:45 am
United StatesJordahl v. [read post]
