Search for: "Rome v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Law Applicable to the Merits of International Arbitration and Current Developments in European Private International Law: Conflict-of-Laws Rules and the Applicability of the Rome Convention, Rome I Regulation and Other EU Law Standards in International ArbitrationAlexander J. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:12 pm
However, the ambitions of the EU have long since outgrown the purely functionalist economic free trade area aims which were first set out in the 1957 Treaty of Rome. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
Roman Catholic Archbishop v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
After a short analysis of the current state of discussion, it is shown that the argument emanates from the erroneous assumption that the question of restitution in such cases is a matter of unjust enrichment according to Art. 10 Rome II Regulation as well as a topic of private international law concerning contractual obligations. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
The high court rejected Wiggins’ constitutional challenges, citing its earlier decision this year in Hollie v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), Mr Justice Owen applied Rome II’s provisions to reach the conclusion that the compensation to be paid by the MIB (acting as the UK’s compensation body under the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) to the claimant as a result of an accident in a Spanish shopping centre car park in December 2007 in which the other driver was German (and uninsured) should be assessed in accordance with Spanish law, as the law of the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
The language of Regulation 13(2)(b), which stated that "the compensation body [here the MIB] shall compensate the injured party...as if...the accident had occurred in Great Britain", was clear on this point. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:33 am
Part V: Cultural Property. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am
Articles on Rome II and Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements The current issue (Vol. 73, No. 1, January 2009) of... [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
His Lordship applied the principle established in Freeport v Arnoldson [2007] E.C.R. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:41 pm
In GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:52 pm
" United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
To reach this conclusion, the opinion walks through the history of arguments over corporate liability since WWII, ranging from Nuremberg to the considered refusal of the states-party to include corporations in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
To reach this conclusion, the opinion walks through the history of arguments over corporate liability since WWII, ranging from Nuremberg to the considered refusal of the states-party to include corporations in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
To reach this conclusion, the opinion walks through the history of arguments over corporate liability since WWII, ranging from Nuremberg to the considered refusal of the states-party to include corporations in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
However, Article 32 of Rome II stated that Rome II applied "from 11 January 2009,.. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm
MISAT (6) , Owusu v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
v=idAUo_fyHW4 His explanation starts at about the two-minute mark.3. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:02 am
The second one is authored by Bernard Haftel, who lectures at the University of Orleans, and discusses the uniform interpretation of the Rome I Regulation (Entre Rome II et Bruxelles I. [read post]
