Search for: "SB v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2022, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
From the brief’s summary: The Eleventh Circuit upheld most of SB 7072’s disclosure obligations by citing Zauderer v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:24 am by Bill Raftery
The text of this Constitution shall be interpreted according to its meaning at the time of its enactment, which meaning shall remain the same until changed pursuant to Article V. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:58 pm
Last week, the Ninth Circuit in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
MARCH Mar. 27: Utah’s governor signs SB 43 into law. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by cdw
On Wednesday the state senate in Washington will hold a hearing on SB 5456, a bill to repeal the death penalty in that state. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:29 pm by Barbara Machado*
SB 145 – Caltrans Advanced Environmental Mitigation and Interstate-15 Wildlife Crossings Requires Caltrans to construct wildlife crossings over Interstate-15 and acquire property that can be preserved and restored to offset the environmental impacts of the state highway system. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:50 pm by Mark Walsh
Demonstrators on each side of United States v. [read post]
State Legislative Developments States continued to pursue and enact new laws affecting the development, distribution and/or use of AI, expanding the legal patchwork of AI laws across the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
The United States relies heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1942 decision, Hines v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am by Justin Mahramas
Assembly Bill 1307 AB 1307, unanimously passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom on September 7, 2023, was crafted in response to the court ruling in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:59 am by Larry Tolchinsky
From the Florida State Senate Session Tracker, here is how this new bill is described: Short Sale Debt Relief. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]