Search for: "SMITH v. HEAD" Results 561 - 580 of 1,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Nor could I crack it over the head of a burglar sneaking into a neighbor’s house without traveling across the street with the vase. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm by Cindy Cohn and Hanni Fakhoury
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
At one, armed with a gun, he pointed his gun at a victim’s head, pushed a 77-year old woman to the ground, and robbed them. [read post]
2 May 2015, 1:47 am by Ben
The Appeals Court decision in Blurred Lines is keenly awaited by many.More on Billboard here , Williams v Bridgeport Music, Inc, No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:23 pm
One of the men, probably Deary-Smith, hit Branch in the head with his gun, opening up a wound that required five staples to close. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  His dissertation was “The Smith Act and the Communist Party: A Study in Political Justice. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Nate Russell
But it’s rare that a quote at the head of a judgement is as good as what BC Supreme Court Justice Sharma gave us this past Friday in Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:23 am by Peter Mahler
Accordingly, dismissal of both the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims was warranted (see generally Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney Inc., 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “What should I do if I have been injured by another party but I can’t afford a lawyer? [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
  * Impulse trade mark registration: no sweat, as AG gives his viewJeremy reports on the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU from the Budapest Municipal Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The case that is before the Supreme Court this week turns the individual-mandate question on its head. [read post]