Search for: "SMITH v. KENNEDY" Results 561 - 580 of 628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2008, 9:33 pm
United States Issue: Whether the “significant nexus” test in Justice Kennedy’s concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Aug 21, 2008): Smith's hybrid-rights theory has divided our sister circuits. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Aug 21, 2008): Smith's hybrid-rights theory has divided our sister circuits. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:43 pm
[Althouse] * Tom Smith wonders: Could the Supreme Court use "crowdsourcing" to avoid mistakes like the Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the elections)… [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:09 am
They say such laws represent an overly intrusive invasion of privacy, since other criminal records are not subject to such readily available public scrutiny.The cases are Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:59 pm
" Crime and Consequences notes that The Federalist Society has posted podcasts on the recent Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
A “difference” apparently not even demonstrated in the circus-like antics of Broward County Judge Larry Seidlin, who presided over the Anna Nicole Smith probate proceeding). [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
  In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Smith (1990), here. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
" Justice Anthony Kennedy asked Smith: "You want us to invalidate the statute because it's a minor inconvenience to a small number of voters? [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Austin Chronicle writer Jordan Smith reports on the Supreme Court's decision to review Kennedy v. [read post]