Search for: "STATE v FRANK" Results 561 - 580 of 4,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
However, as Frank Pasquale [1] rightly suggests in his thoughtful foreword, this is also “a collection that should be read by a wide range of audiences both in and around the legal profession” (p v). [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by fjhinojosa
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
A Dutch court has rejected a copyright infringement claim on Anne Frank’s diary, concluding that the defendants had taken all reasonable measures to block or sufficiently discourage access to the website hosting the material. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr Rasool had, of course, not disclosed any of this information on the ex parte application in the present case, completely in breach of the duty of full and frank disclosure. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
A recent post on this site by Frank McRoberts explains the two competing strands of New York case law on tax estoppel, one strand holding tax returns are not determinative of ownership status, the other holding they are. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:52 am by ernst
  His talk is entitiled “Inchoate Citizens: Black Canadians, Law and the Racial State” (More). [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:01 am by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
The main reason is the widely held belief that the Supreme Court blessed the modern massive prior restraint system in the 1980 case Snepp v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm by fjhinojosa
Rob Sherwin’s article “Source” of Protection: The Status fo the Reporter’s Privilege in Texas and a Call to Arms for the State’s Legislators and Journalists is cited in the following article: Frank D. [read post]
The court also stated that the Supreme Court had wrongly interpreted international law in the Frank case. [read post]