Search for: "STATE v. WISE"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 6:43 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:56 pm
In Louisiana v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
Section 3731 permits the United States to appeal an order of the district court that, inter alia, suppresses evidence in a criminal case upon the filing of a certification by the U.S. that the suppressed evidence is important and the appeal not taken for the purpose of delay. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
In Vicente Lazo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:55 pm
The title of this post is the Oregon Secretary of State's description of the situation with that state's governor. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:31 am
By Eric Goldman Knepper v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
States fashioning revenge porn statutes would be wise to track these rulings. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 5:01 pm
" State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:15 pm
Vincent Forcier v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:05 am
The Court of Appeals sides with the state in this case, but not before taking a deep dive into whether an inmate was properly disciplined for possessing photographs of family and friends depicting perceived signs of gang affiliation.The case is Williams v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
United States (1928) and Goldman v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
In Di Tomaso v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
That choice, whether wise or unwise, does not amount to an abuse of process. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:05 pm
"Jurisprudence in the United States has long held that the Pledge of Allegiance cannot be made mandatory (most recently in Lane v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
” This past summer, in State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm
The 6-3 decision in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
Although this may disappoint South Africa’s supporters, I do think the Court was wise to show this restraint, particularly as one thinks about the nature of the provisional measures phase of a case like this. [read post]
