Search for: "Said v. Clinton" Results 561 - 580 of 1,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
EO 11478, issued by President Nixon in 1969, bars discrimination against federal employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, and age, and was amended by President Clinton in 1998 through EO 13087 to include sexual orientation. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:43 pm
 By contrast, in 2006, the Court in Randall v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
The memo notes that Vice President Spiro Agnew was said to be part of a conspiracy and that it would be difficult to have a proper indictment of co-conspirators without including the vice president (a point also true of a conspiracy involving a president). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Labaran Maku, Information Minister of Nigeria, said:'We reserve the right to make our laws without apologies to other countries.'Hillary Clinton’s speech was often reported alongside earlier comments by UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s threatening to link LGBT rights and aid.So far this sounds familiar, right? [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:55 am by jonathanturley
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:27 pm
And during the fall 2005 senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Biden grilled Roberts in his views of privacy in the high-tech age -- an issue Biden said was of equal importance to Roe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of State of Missouri ex rel, Koster v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:43 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
One of the strongest aspects of this litigation is that it has a case right on point: Clinton v New York (1998), which held the line-item veto unconstitutional. [read post]