Search for: "Samuel Anthony Alito"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
Contrary to the government’s claim (echoed in Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent), the court finds that the word “under” generates no ambiguity in this statute. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
In response to a question from Justice Samuel Alito, Rosenkranz said that a statute criminalizing a “crime of moral turpitude” would be constitutionally problematic. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:55 am
The only alignment that has voted together in more than two decisions is the one composed of the five more conservative justices – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito were the only dissenters in both cases. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:22 am
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Anthony M. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:26 am
The presentations of Bridget Asay (representing Alfred Gobeille, the responsible Vermont official) and John Bash (representing the federal government, supporting Vermont) were hampered by caustic criticism from Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Justice Samuel Alito started the stare decisis discussion with what he said were five questions to be considered, the first one of which did not appear on the Casey list. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
When the court takes the bench, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are absent. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:43 am
After exploring some of the complexities (from opposite perspectives), Justices Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor found themselves in agreement: They both perceived the case as “very odd. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
Alito explains that his opinion was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
This means Justice Samuel Alito is absolutely correct in declaring in the first line of his fifty-one-page dissent that “[s]omething strange has happened since our prior decision in this case. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
But as Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas point out in separate dissents, the world is usually more complicated and nuanced than sound-bite summaries can accommodate. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:02 pm
Justice Samuel Alito for one found that reading untenable: Do you really think that whoever wrote this removal provision thought about all this stuff that you’re telling us now? [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm
Finally, Justice Neil Gorsuch joined Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion, Thomas’ concurring opinion, and Alito’s opinion that concurred only in the judgment. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
” The decision is likely to be written by either Chief Justice John Roberts or Justice Samuel Alito, because neither justice has written an opinion from the December sitting yet. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
Justice Samuel Alito, in a fifty-one-page dissent that he summarized from the bench, said more candidly that the decision amounted to “blind deference” to the “[c]onsideration of race [that] pervades every aspect of UT’s admissions process. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
Justice Samuel Alito explains that a prohibition of all disparaging views is still a prohibition of viewpoints. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
Sotomayor spoke at the Leadership Alliance Presidential Forum in Washington on November 4, and Justice Samuel Alito hosted the 2016 American Inns of Court Celebration of Excellence at the Supreme Court on November 5. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Justice Samuel Alito was Unikowsky’s most skeptical interlocutor. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:50 pm
Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg all seemed like solid votes for the federal government, defending the subsidies, while the challengers could clearly count on the votes of Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito. [read post]
