Search for: "Scott v. Scott et al" Results 561 - 580 of 812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm by Florian Mueller
Microsoft asks the court to adjudge its motion to dismiss regardless of any commitments not to close the deal before a given date.Here's Microsoft's motion, filed late Tuesday afternoon Pacific Time:De Martini et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
Justice Scott Brister delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
SCHMITZ, ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-07-00359-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-11-07)The Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus.Justice Scott Brister delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM Defendant's conviction and sentence. 07a0257p.06 2007/07/10 Brown, et al v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
District Court for the Southern District of California, Hammock et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am by WSLL
City of Casper, et al., 2011 WY 35, __ P.3d __ (Wyo. 2011), followed by Madsen v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
But by granting the motion for rehearing, the Court has given itself more time to think about the issues. 3 Improvident grant: Aggie bonfire case Zachry Construction Corp., et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Paul Guardian Insurance, et al , a 12-page opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Dreaded, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
Explains Scott:The Long Arm of Canadian LawIn a ground-breaking decision (Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack et al, 2014 BCSC 1063) the British Columbia Supreme Court has issued an interim injunction against a third party, Google, ordering it to stop indexing or referencing certain websites in its search results, not just in Canada but everywhere. [read post]