Search for: "Senior v. U.s.*" Results 561 - 580 of 1,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2008, 10:55 am
 As reiterated in another recent 9th Circuit case, Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Questioning will proceed in order of seniority, beginning with the Chief Justice. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Karnoski, 18-676, Trump v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Brookings Senior Fellow Bruce Riedel will launch his new book on the subject and join Senior Fellow Suzanne Maloney in conversation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
  Majority Opinion Upheld Delegation of Authority to Arbitrator, Even to Decide Validity of Arbitration Agreement as a Threshold Matter   The majority held that both the FAA and its own past precedent, particularly its 1967 decision in Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
The two senior relists, both now on relist number six since the record arrived, are Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although the Second Circuit may have gotten to the right legal result (given the constraints under which lower courts operate), there is one aspect of its reasoning that I believe reflects a common and dangerous misunderstanding (an overreading, actually) of the highly contested Obamacare ruling, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Madden, who is African-American, worked as a crew worker for CWS until he was fired following an incident on March 22, 2006, in which he set off firecrackers at a work site and was reported by his white supervisor to senior managers. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:56 am
Davidson, 540 F.Supp.2d 1322, 1341-43 (N.D.Ga.2007); Brett Senior & Assocs., P.C. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
Davidson, 540 F.Supp.2d 1322, 1341-43 (N.D.Ga.2007); Brett Senior & Assocs., P.C. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]