Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 3:58 am
Assumption of risk in a work-related activityRios v Town of Colonie, 256 AD2d 900Public safety agencies often sponsor athletic events or authorize members to participate in them. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
The position had not been altered by the decision of the Supreme Court in A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 25 (“A v BBC”). [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
There were many, including Harris v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
There is not a sharp line. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Prof Uelmen thought the best opinion of the year was Justice Liu's concurrence in People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:55 am
Sharp Elecs. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:02 am
The case was tried by Mrs Justice Sharp on 21 to 25 May 2012 and on 21 December 2012 she gave judgment dismissing the defence of justification and awarding the claimant, Mr Miller, damages of £65,000 ([2012] EWHC 3721 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:37 am
Sharp J awarded £65,000 in damages. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
While the precise words used and the names of the persons to whom they were spoken (and when) must, so far as possible, be set out in the Particulars of Claim if not already contained in the Claim Form (CPR PD 53 para 2.4) the Court confirmed the narrow exception summarised by Sharp J in Freer v Zeb & Ors [2008] EWHC 212 (QB) [31]. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 9:39 am
Matthias Zigann) granted Sharp an injunction against Daimler (which triggered a settlement, see 1, 2), as did the 21st Civil Chamber in a Conversant v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:04 am
The L2 v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:00 am
As now reported by the local press and in the blogosphere, the Eleventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 4:53 pm
In a landmark joint judgment of the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Dame Victoria Sharp, and Mr Justice Swift, overturned findings that Mr Beckwith had breached Principles 2 and 6 of the SRA Principles and reversed his fine and quashed the costs order (Beckwith v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2020] EWHC 3231 (Admin)). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am
That year, he famously wrote in dissent in Callins v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 1:07 pm
The cases are Boumediene v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:33 am
But, on Tuesday, one of its first new offerings encountered a sharp attack from lawyers for six of the detainees who won a Supreme Court ruling and the right to challenge their detention in federal court. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Pfizer v. [read post]
