Search for: "Short v. Jones" Results 561 - 580 of 1,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2013, 11:06 am
., by revoking the discharge.Judge Milan Smith's opinion is short, cogent and entirely right.Not hard at all. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:53 am by Juan Antúnez
William (Bill) Glasko of Miami, Florida was on the winning side of Golden v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am by John Day
Jones, 164 S.W.2d 823 (Tenn. 1942) the law required the filing of a sworn, detailed statement of campaign expenses not more than ten but no less than five days before an election. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:03 pm by Donald Thompson
May, 52 A.D.3d 147, 150-51 (2008).What can be done do to challenge these stops short of a New York City style class action? [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 Two differently constituted Courts of Appeal for England and Wales, within a very short period, appear to have come up with quite different approaches to how to treat an appeal in which they take issue with the trial judge's findings of fact, one case being Lumos and the other being Okotoks v Fine & Country (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that a former university dean failed to establish that he was fired because he followed the school’s sexual assault policy in investigating a student’s claims that she was sexually assaulted by two football players, the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment on the dean’s wrongful discharge claim (Jones v University of Iowa, August 23, 2013, Zager, B). [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Molea, 201… http://t.co/7bU2rwzcKn -> Mark Lemley Asks: Are Short Patent Trials a Rush to Judgment? [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:31 pm by Dave Maass
For the full complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/lessig-v-liberation-music-complaint For Liberation Music's email to Prof. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Courtney Minick
Said and United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:58 am by Eric
For example, in Jones v, thedirty, the judge took 230 off the table, which left the defendant Nik Richie defending content he didn’t create. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am by Bexis
 In short, there’s no duty in California for a publisher to publish anything more about a prescription medical product than it actually undertook to publish.A similar result was reached in Cheatham v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:44 am by admin
 This, essentially, was the holding of Jones, and the Appellate court found that the trial court did not review the case under the lens of strict scrutiny when applying the statute to the facts. [read post]