Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration" Results 561 - 580 of 753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 10:53 am by Danielle Citron
Smith held that neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the American with Disabilities Act is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:37 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
Smith held that neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the American with Disabilities Act is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:42 pm by admin
Smith held that neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the American with Disabilities Act is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
State of Maharashtra and another AIR 1967 SC 1 and the Court observed as under: It is difficult to see how this decision can be pressed into service by Mr. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Electra Daniel Administrator ad litem for the estate of George Daniel (deceased) v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, heard 21 June 2011. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Smith Generating Station coal-fired CFB Boiler Project (Smith), Conoco Phillips and Peabody's Kentucky NewGas Synthetic Natural Gas Production plant (NewGas), and Cash Creek Generation LLC's coal-fired Cash Creek Generating Station (Cash Creek). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm by Erik J. Heels
* Patent 'Reform' Passes (2011-06-26) There is not much good in this compromise bill, which will soon be signed into law. http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/06/patent-reform-passes.html * Woman Charged With 'Obstructing Governmental Administration' For Filming Police From Her Front Yard (2011-06-26) Welcome to 1984 and #SecurityTheatre.… [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:59 am
Smith, there is no Free Exercise right to exemption from a general anti-fraud law. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
  563 A.2d at 126-27.Numerous other courts throughout the country have held, similarly to Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Moreover, Hall v Wandsworth did hold that: "the role of the reviewer remains that of an administrator, not an independent tribunal". [read post]