Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 561 - 580 of 5,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2024, 6:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Follow-up to previous posting – Judge Chutkin unsealed Jack Smith’s redacted immunity brief v Trump see The Cornerstone of Democracy, Essentials, October 2, 2024: A compendium of the best reporting and commentary surrounding the pivotal 2024 elections in the United States….What you will find are links, with brief commentary, to work that I believe advances the conversation we should be having about America’s – and the world’s… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
Judge Smith's opinion offers a bit more detail, but comes out the same way. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
A federal judge whose role in the Supreme Court's 1986 Bowers v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:55 am
MukaseyNo. 06-2496Heard en bancJune 9, 2008Precedentialhttp://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/062496p.pdfAs an en banc case, it was heard by Judges Scirica, Sloviter, McKee, Rendell, Barry, Ambro, Fuentes, Smith, Fisher, Chagares, Jordan, Hardiman, and Garth.Majority opinion written by Judge Fuentes and joined by nine judges. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am by Steve Kalar
When that happens, remember and re-read Dunn – Judge Smith’s analysis and interpretation of Miller v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 11:40 am by Lyle Denniston
  An appeal from Judge Leon’s earlier ruling (Klayman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:20 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The Supreme Court hears argument Wednesday in Gunn v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The judge commented: “The position may well be fact-sensitive. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith (coupled with a concurrence from denial of en banc rehearing by the original panel, plus Judge Pregerson). [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada rendered it judgment in Cowper-Smith v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the most closely-watched patent case of the term, United States / Smith & Nephew v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Smith & Nephew, in which the Federal Circuit found that administrative patent judges (APJs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) had been unconstitutionally appointed because they were principal officers under the Appointments Clause. [read post]