Search for: "Spencer v Spencer" Results 561 - 580 of 1,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 5:41 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Strathy as new chief justice for Ontario Court of Appeal - CTV News Why some law firms are offering piecemeal services - Globalnews.caMedical marijuana-prescribing doctors should be reported, Ottawa says  Former LSUC Treasurer Pawlitza to receive honorary doctorateEverything you need to know about what data brokers know about you Jim Keegstra is dead, Holocaust denier who took hate speech battle to Supreme Court - National PostGuantanamo hunger strike under renewed scrutiny as lawyers get video… [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of R v Spencer (2014 SCC 43), the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that internet users have a reasonable expectation of privacy and anonymity online. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:53 am by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
On Friday, June 13, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark decision (R v Spencer) upsetting common interpretations of a provision of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) that had been relied upon for many years as permitting pre-warrant disclosures of subscriber information by Internet Service Providers and other organizations in response to police requests. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/fJ3MzJ9… http://t.co/aS2INXOvuO -> Supreme Court releases reasons in R. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/fJ3MzJ9… http://t.co/aS2INXOvuO -> Supreme Court releases reasons in R. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:25 pm by jmaddock
The accused, Matthew David Spencer, was charged with possession and distribution of child pornography as a result of a police investigation using Limewire, an anonymous peer-to-peer file sharing software. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am by David Fraser
[Note: this post is a work in progress, and will be updated as I digest the decision.]This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43.The case, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, has finally provided some certainty regarding the expectation of privacy that all Canadians enjoy in their online activities. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:19 am by David Fraser
As I blogged yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada has announced that it will release its decision in the appeal from Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in R v Spencer, 2011 SKCA 144. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm by David Fraser
SCC Cases (Lexum) - Judgments to be Rendered in Appeals: 34644 Matthew David Spencer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Hyperlinks to protected works made freely available on the internet do not infringe the copyright subsisting in the protected works, unless the hyperlink gives users a method by which they can circumvent access restrictions to the work (e.g. subscription access), because then the work is being made available to a new public, i.e. consumers not considered by the copyright holder.After referring those of us keen to understand the distinction between trade evidence and expert evidence to the Rihanna… [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Before you huff and puff about the iniquity of it all, bear in mind that you lot (landlords) had the section 21 decision of Spencer v. [read post]