Search for: "Stanford Law Review" Results 561 - 580 of 3,995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
And the legal standards by which takings are judged are not found in the domestic laws of the United States or even the laws of the “expropriating” nation, but rather in customary international law. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Revesz, New York University School of Law President Biden’s memorandum modernizing regulatory review addresses three key failings in the review process. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Emily Rong Zhang (Stanford University, Department of Political Science) has posted New Tricks for an Old Dog: Deterring the Vote Through Confusion in Felon Disenfranchisement (Missouri Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, 2019) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2021 there was a pre-trial review in the case of Banks v Cadwalladr before Nicklin J. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
'" Law enforcement's review of the videos further revealed that Shroyer entered the restricted area of the Capitol building. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Gene Takagi
Racial Equity / BLM: Overcoming Racial Equity Fatigue (Benjamin Abtan, Stanford Social Innovation Review) A Black couple ‘erased themselves’ from their home to see if the appraised value would go up. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Kay, and Paige Patton, Pay Governance LLC, on Monday, December 6, 2021 Tags: Board composition, Board dynamics, Boards of Directors, Diversity, ESG, Human capital SPAC Governance: In Need of Judicial Review Posted by Michael Klausner (Stanford University) and Michael Ohlrogge (NYU), on Tuesday, December 7, 2021 Tags: Agency costs, Business judgment rule, Capital formation, Fairness review, Fiduciary… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 8:49 am by Media Law Prof
Jonathan Abel, University of California, Hastings, College of Law, is publishing Cop-'Like': The First Amendment, Criminal Procedure, and Police Social Media Speech in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:10 am
Posted by Michael Klausner (Stanford University) and Michael Ohlrogge (NYU), on Tuesday, December 7, 2021 Editor's Note: Michael Klausner is the Nancy and Charles Munger Professor of Business and Professor of Law at Stanford Law School; Michael Ohlrogge is Assistant Professor at NYU School of Law. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1997, Catherine Fisk and Erwin Chemerinsky wrote an extensive analysis of the filibuster for the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Stanford Law Professor Michael Klausner and NYU Law Professor Michael Ohlrogge’s November 19, 2021 paper entitled “SPAC Governance: In Need of Judicial Review” can be found here. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 11:05 am by Ezra Rosser
New Article: Josh Gupta-Kagan, America’s Hidden Foster Care System, 72 Stanford Law Review 841 (2020). [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:00 am by Joe Mullin
  Join EFF’s Cindy Cohn and Danny O’Brien as they talk to Stanford’s Daphne Keller about why the current approach to content moderation is failing, and how a better online conversation is possible. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 9:00 am by Gene Takagi
Chiodini, Nonprofit Law Matters, Jan. 25, 2012) How Foundations Are Using Impact Investing to Advance Racial Equity (Stanford Social Innovation Review) The Case for Selective Discrimination (A. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
ICYMI:  Stanford Law's notice of ASLH fellowships for Lawrence Friedman and Robert W. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:26 am by Josh Blackman
Just yesterday, Eugene referenced those views, most prominently expressed by Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram Amar in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm by Lukas Gemar
In a recent paper, Stanford University researchers Cristina Isabel Ceballos, David Freeman Engstrom, and Daniel E. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
[instead of waiting for February when many of the student-edited law reviews reopen -- and you can have the article published by February, instead of a year later.] [read post]