Search for: "Starr v. Starr" Results 561 - 580 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A CEQA Trustee Agency “Muscles Up”: Third District Holds Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Newly Exercised Power To Require Notice Of And Regulate Substantial Water Diversions – Even Absent Streambed Alteration – Was Always Unambiguously Authorized By Fish & Game Code Section 1602
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Holds CEQA Challenge To Ministerial Approval Of Development Project Modifications Barred By Res Judicata, Water Supply Assessment Not Required
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Tide Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Affirms Judgment Upholding CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption For Costco Gas Station/Parking Lot Project Within Existing Shopping Center
1 Nov 2021, 2:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Holds Res Judicata Bars Relitigation of CEQA Claims In Second Writ Petition Challenging Reapproved Quarry Project And Partially Recirculated EIR: Barred Claims Were Either Adjudicated Adversely To Petitioner On First Petition, Or Could Have Been Litigated In First Action
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Indicting the President: President Clinton’s Justice Department Says No
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” Gravel v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Fourth District Rejects CEQA Challenge To San Diego’s Use of Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption For Mission Beach Amusement Park Lease Amendment and Extension
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am by Arthur F. Coon
  San Diegans For Open Government v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Individual DOGGR Oil Well Permits Not Barred By Res Judicata Based On Prior Judgment Rendered On Mootness/Ripeness Grounds
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Quoting Busick v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Adoption of CEQA Thresholds of Significance Is Not A CEQA “Project,” First District Holds In Reinstating BAAQMD’s 2010 Air Quality Guidelines
16 Aug 2013, 4:04 pm by Jamie Dierks
  (California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
No Surprises Here: First District Applies CEQA Subsequent Review Standards Mandated by Supreme Court on Remand, Again Affirms Judgment for Petitioner in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens Litigation
11 May 2017, 8:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
When all was said and done, it was a case of “same wine, different bottle” for Defendant and Appellant San Mateo Community College District (“District”) after the First District Court of Appeal’s published May 5, 2017 decision, following remand from the California Supreme Court, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds CEQA Action Can Be Brought Directly Against Local Air District to Challenge “Authority to Construct” Issued for Mendocino County Asphalt Production Operation
1 Jun 2017, 3:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Friends of Outlet Creek v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Another Call for CEQA Litigation Reform?  Second District Rejects NIMBY Group’s CEQA, Coastal Act, and Land Use Challenges, Affirms Judgment Upholding Approval of Zoning-Compliant And CEQA-Exempt Eldercare Facility On Flat, Graded, Vacant One-Acre Infill Site Surrounded By Residential and Commercial Development
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Delay Denied: First District Affirms Trial Court’s Denial of Seventh ADA Continuance Request Made In CEQA Case Under California Rules of Court, Rule 1.100, Due To Burden On Trial Court’s Docket Management And Excessive Delay Contrary To Fundamental Nature of Expedited CEQA Proceeding
28 Oct 2024, 11:13 am by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
  On September 26, 2024, the First District Court of Appeal filed its published its opinion in Friends of the South Fork Gualala v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Addresses Numerous Significant CEQA Issues In Action Challenging City of San Diego’s Utility Undergrounding Projects
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  McCann v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Law and Media Round Up – 20 July 2015
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  This was the fifth libel case of 2015 – so far the claimants have won two and the defendants have won three (for the others see our post on Starr v Ward). [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com
Law and Media Round Up – 29 June 2015
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in Starr v Ward continued last week, concluding on 24 June 2015 after eight days. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com
Tuesday round-up
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In Koontz v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Ask the author: “Mr. Everything” – Joan Biskupic on Chief Justice John Roberts
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
” Can you give us a rough sketch of the man whom Kenneth Starr tagged “Mr. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 24 May 2021
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Officials also obtained records from Starr’s work and personal email addresses. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
The Week That Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Recap of 2023 CEQA Amendments Now In Effect
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com