Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 9:03 am
In this instance, as to Petitioner's North Carolina Representation, the Court reviewed Ms. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:50 am
Back in 2008, I posted an entry about the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine finding that evidence from the Kelley Blue Book is admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(17), which provides an exception to the... [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
By James Bowden On Tuesday, a task force in North Carolina concluded that it would request restitution of $50,000 from the North Carolina legislature to each of the estimated 1,500-2,000 living victims of the state's formal 45-year experiment with eugenics. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
By James Bowden On Tuesday, a task force in North Carolina concluded that it would request restitution of $50,000 from the North Carolina legislature to each of the estimated 1,500-2,000 living victims of the state's formal 45-year experiment with eugenics. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:22 am
For example, in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:09 am
J.A. 129–31.In support of its motion, SKI provided a sworn declarationfrom a senior managerof SKI, stating that all of SKI’s salesare to customers outside of the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:27 am
Though the result was preordained, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in FTC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Waldburger, the Court held that the federal Superfund law does not preempt North Carolina’s statute of repose, which bars state-law tort claims more than ten years after the defendant’s last culpable act. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
” Brook said the ACLU already has at least one case before United States District Court Judge William Osteen in federal district court for the Middle District of North Carolina. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 6:43 am
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to consider E.M.A. ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:54 am
United States, 125 Fed. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:54 am
United States, 125 Fed. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
North Carolina, 131 S.Ct. 2394 (2011) (requiring courts to consider all attendant qualities of youth at the interrogation stage of the proceedings.) [read post]
