Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 11:47 am
See State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
United States and Fong Yue Ting v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:18 pm
As a law firm focusing on representing people charged with federal crimes in North Carolina, we aim to keep our clients and the public informed about crucial legal matters. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
United States, and readers should expect a blog post on the case soon. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
United States, and readers should expect a blog post on the case soon. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:00 pm
Earlier this year, in State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:43 am
Recently, in McNeill v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
Next week the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in two historic cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
In response to questions from Justices Ginsburg, Kagan, and Kennedy regarding whether North Carolina could assert general jurisdiction over the parent, Mr. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
University of North Carolina. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:00 am
A big case was argued this week before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:49 am
United States, ___ F. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
Interestingly (but this doesn't weaken the effort in the slightest) Epic's home state of North Carolina is not among them.Here's the 35 state AGs' amicus brief (this post continues below the document):22-01-27 Utah Et Al. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 5:54 pm
While North Carolina courts surely have an important interest in not enforcing constitutionally infirm foreign judgments, the appropriate manner of correcting foreign trial court errors is "by appeal within the [foreign] state system and by direct review in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
