Search for: "State of Oregon v. Long" Results 561 - 580 of 889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]
In finding that past salary may never be considered, the Rizo decision overrules the Ninth Circuit’s prior ruling in Kouba v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As long as the traveler leaves within that 30-day window, he or she will not be considered to have violated U.S. immigration laws by overstaying. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tabatha Abu El-HajIn my last post, I suggested that McKesson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
Pointing to Oregon as an example of “the best large-scale, long-run, exclusive vote-by-mail system in the United States,” Shoag and Veuger encourage states making adaptations with limited time to look to existing models. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Kevin
I pointed the camera, I chose when to push the button and most importantly, I did the interpretive dance that puzzled him long enough to get him to stand still for the shot. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 10:44 am by Bill Marler
Shortly thereafter, in the case Texas Food Industry Association v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Oregon courts take the view that the right extends to carrying weapons openly, but allows restrictions on carrying loaded guns, so long as the law allows the carrying of both an unloaded gun and ammunition. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
However, some states, such as Oregon, have passed laws that provide greater protection for religious exercise than required by the federal Constitution. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
Arizona; (2) whether the interviewer’s state of mind has any bearing on whether a suspect’s statement is voluntary under the established law of Oregon v. [read post]