Search for: "State of S. D., Appeal of"
Results 561 - 580
of 27,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 1:39 pm
However, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the issue of attorney’s fees. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:24 pm
But its appeal was dismissed for failure to comply with Illinois Supreme Court Rule 307(d), which states the requirements for establishing appellate jurisdiction over an appeal of a temporary restraining order. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:11 pm
Appellant makes an argument, it's not a very good one, and it gets rejected.But here's the somewhat unusual fact:The seizure at issue involved the United States seizing $100 million.For that amount of money at stake, you'd think that the appellant might be able to come up with some better arguments on appeal. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
The D. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:16 am
” In its decision, the Appeals Court stated, “We agree with the defendant that Laviolette did not articulate a methodology that is sufficiently reliable to satisfy the Lanigan standard. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:23 pm
App. 1999), the Court of Appeals stated:There, the division stated that, to apply the statute of limitations in a CDARA case, “a claim accrues when a physical manifestation of a defect appears, even though its cause is not known at that time. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
On appeal, Mr. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
At trial the State introduced, over the defendant’s objection, several DMV records to prove that the defendant’s license was revoked and that he knew that to be the case. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:33 pm
§§ 1692k(d); 1692l. [2] 589 U.S. ____ (2019). [3] Justice Ginsberg alone dissented, stating that the fraud alleged in Rotkiske’s petition was sufficient to present the fraud-based discovery rule for review on appeal. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:05 pm
Gibbs & Jennifer D. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm
The court’s decision affirmed the District Court below. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:15 am
§ 314(d)—which states that decisions to institute inter partes review (IPR) proceedings shall not be appealable—permits appeals of PTAB institution decisions based upon 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:46 am
§ 1003.2(d), which the BIA has consistently held to strip them of jurisdiction to an alien's Motion to Reopen or Reconsider once the alien has been physically removed from the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
D’Agostino Assocs. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm
P. 38.1(d). [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
A week ago, the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
A week ago, the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
This post summarizes published criminal law and related decisions released by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in February, 2021, which may be of interest to state practitioners. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:44 am
By Joshua D. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. [read post]
