Search for: "State v Reed" Results 561 - 580 of 2,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2007, 9:19 am
Reed also wants the Supreme Court to grant a change of venue for a follow-up hearing on the issue.The Clerk's Docket lists this case as: Case Number: 45 S 00 - 0709 - OR - 00366; STATE OF INDIANA EX REL LAKE CTY BD OF ELEC -V- LAKE SUP CT [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:50 am by Wanda Gomez
Miami, FL – June 9, 2016 –Representing the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers – Miami Chapter, Firm attorneys Howard Srebnick and Joshua Shore co-authored  an amicus brief in support of the defendants in the Supreme Court of the United States in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
Becerra 16-1146 Issues: (1) Whether a determination that a law is content-based leaves room for a court to apply something less than strict scrutiny, specifically (a) whether the court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
This is based on the fact that the Rules are not law (per Lord Reed at [17] and [53]), and therefore do not govern the determination of appeals, other than appeals brought on the ground that the decision is not in accordance with the Rules. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
For this reason, Mr Anson had paid federal and state tax in the US on his share of HV’s profits. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Reed and Ryan McCoy Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday morning in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:56 pm by Sherry L.
United States Anti-Doping Agency, No. 12-0606 (W.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am by ASAD KHAN
More significantly, member states would risk breaching of their obligations under the international instruments cited. [read post]