Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 561 - 580 of 1,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Rotherham Borough Council & Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, heard 20 October 2014. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Sims v Dacorum Borough Council [2014] UKSC 63 If there is a positive to take from this, it is that it is a Supreme Court judgment that won't take long to discuss. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Sims v Dacorum Borough Council the Court unanimously dismissed the appeal challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC V Monk [1992] AC 478. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk [1992] AC 478, which states that a notice to quit given by one of a number of joint periodic tenants is effective to terminate the tenancy. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Rotherham Borough Council & Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, heard 20 October 2014. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm by Giles Peaker
Jakimaviciute, R (On the Application Of) v Hammersmith And Fulham London Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 Eligibility for allocation list, reasonable preference and homelessness. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Rotherham Borough Council & Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, heard 20 October 2014. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 10:11 am by Native American Rights Fund
Borough of Thorpe (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, definition of museum)Becker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Rotherham Borough Council & Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, heard 20 October 2014. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:41 am by SJM
As a footnote, we have been shown a ‘companion’ decision of the same Court in Hegab v Westminster CC (B5/2014/1528 (A)). [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:52 am
 Cranford Community College v Cranford College Ltd [2014] EWHC 2999 (IPEC), decided by Judge Richard Hacon on 19 September, is another in the line of swift, simple decisions of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, which demonstrate the virtues of that humble tribunal.Cranford Community College (originally Cranford Community School) had since 1975 been a state secondary school. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The McGraw-Hill Case Which brings us to last week’s decision by the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Retirement Plan for General Employees v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:36 pm by Giles Peaker
They are not the only London council to consider five years residence requirement – so are LB Southwark – but their stated reason for the increase is specifically because: Increased costs in inner London combined with restrictions on housing benefit has resulted in more households moving to outer London boroughs like Barnet. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am by Giles Peaker
While the statement of reasons in this case gives a clear basis for the decision, there is no address to the Upper Tribunal case of TD v SSWP and London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames (HB) 2013 UKUT 642 AAC or the finding on the meaning of ‘occupy’ in the regulations in R (Marchant) v Swale Borough Council HBRB [2000] 1 FLR 246. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by S S
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]