Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 561 - 580 of 24,588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 3:09 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
When an employee opts for the latter route, courts will assess the case using the framework set out in McDonnell-Douglas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Once a defendant makes this prima facie showing, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact (see id. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
To satisfy this burden, the challenging party must show more than the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:52 am by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in his case, Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook opinion (the court praises that dissent as “influential”–though surely not more influential in California state courts than Barrett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
 In re Post Foods, LLC, 2024 USPQ2d 25 (TTAB 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas V. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am by Kristy Parker
Few appellate court arguments have been more anticipated than the one happening Tuesday in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Nathan and Parker) rejects these arguments and the law stands.The case is Restaurant Law Center v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 4:47 pm by CoL .net
Articles 1, 2, and 4 are provisions that positively state the scope of recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments in the two regions; Articles 3, 5, 12, and 13 are provisions that clearly recognize and enforce the scope of civil and commercial judgments of the courts of the two regions. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:46 am by Tobin Admin
Judge Hodges  explained that if the defendant carries his burden of showing that the suit was filed more than two years after the cause of action accrued, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to produce evidence showing that an issue existed regarding whether the limitation period was tolled. [read post]