Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 561 - 580
of 15,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted a defendant’s motion to decertify a class because plaintiff’s damages model was not consistent with his theory of liability as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:27 pm
Based on the Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 2:01 pm
C. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
The court held that the SEC's allegations met the elements § 10(b), Rule 10(b)-5, § 206 of the Investment Advisors Act, and § 15(c) of the Exchange Act, reversed and remanded the case for further proceedings. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:25 am
And here's my summary of his dicta:Howes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:52 am
(b) Since McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court today in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
The state's position is that the district court decision settles every issue decided between the parties for the purpose of retrial, so if that court says the prisoner is right on claim A but wrong on B, C, D, E, and F, he has to appeal a decision he won if he doesn't want what he believes to be errors on B through F repeated at the retrial. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 4:02 am
Miller, won for co-defendants in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 4:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
If so: [¶] (a) State all facts upon which you base this contention; [¶] (b) State the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of each PERSON who has knowledge of those facts; and [¶] (c) Identify all DOCUMENTS that support your contention. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
B. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
” The Bankruptcy Court disagreed, stating that it had the power to enter judgment on the counterclaim under § 157(b)(1). [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:35 am
Section 332(c)(7)(B)(ii) explicitly supplants state authority by requiring zoning authorities to render a decision “within a reasonable period of time,” and the meaning of that phrase is indisputably a question of federal law. [read post]
