Search for: "State v. Clara"
Results 561 - 580
of 881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Garza v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
In an ACS Issue Brief, Pratheepan Gulasekaram, a Santa Clara University law school professor, explains why the Supreme Court’s narrow opinion in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:26 am
At Concurring Opinions, Santa Clara Lawprof Kyle Graham bemoans his plan to engage in empirical analysis of the impact of the 2009 Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:16 am
After all, I do teach Portee v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
The clerk’s office’s actions violated Voit’s rights under both the federal and state Constitutions to access the courts. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010 - “Campaigns for Judicial Office: The Impact of Caperton v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:43 am
Kyle Graham (Santa Clara), guest blogging at Concurring Opinions, visited the California State Archive and reviewed the old case file. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:44 am
The case is Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:52 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
Ct. 1942 [CB 1306] Facts: Elderly Clara Sather lives with the Cooks. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
First, we have this quote from Santa Clara law professor, Bradley Joondeph, who runs a blog on the health-care challenges. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
If interested, the ACA Litigation Blog is a great resource and hosted by Santa Clara University Professor of Law Brad Joondeph and Brandon Douglass, Judicial Extern/Office of Staff, Attorneys United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
Apple retains the right to withdraw from the settlement in the event an excessive number of requests for exclusion are received.The Court will hold a hearing in this case (Johnson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Concepcion, Smith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:30 pm
Federal Election Commission was the lead case), and the historic fight in 2000 over the Presidency that the Court decided in Bush v. [read post]
