Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 561 - 580
of 27,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2016, 8:29 am
In Indiana, when a custodial parent wishes to move either out-of-state or out of the country, he or she needs to comply with Indiana Code Chapter 31-17-2.2, which requires notification of the courts and the other parent. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:29 am
In Indiana, when a custodial parent wishes to move either out-of-state or out of the country, he or she needs to comply with Indiana Code Chapter 31-17-2.2, which requires notification of the courts and the other parent. [read post]
5 May 2019, 1:03 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:48 am
Hamamoto, No. 29742, holding that there is no right of appeal from an administrative decision on a protest under the State’s health and human services procurement code. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
Posted by Zachary Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, February 10, 2020 Editor's Note: Zachary Gubler is the Marie Selig Professor of Law at Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
In Ramkissoon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
AT&T Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 325, 332; see State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
Last Friday, the Third Court of Appeals in Austin issued its memorandum opinion in Milazzo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:30 pm
The complaint (full text) in Yoder v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:45 pm
” Moore v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 2:09 am
See, North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:11 am
This is argued in a Northern District, Dallas Division case styled, Curtis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:49 pm
Oracle Corp. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1191 (discussed here) in which the Court held that the California Labor Code and Unfair Competition Law apply to overtime work performed in California for a California-based employer by out-of-state plaintiffs. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 am
See Lennie House v Commonwealth of Kentucky, No 2007-CA-000417-DG (Ky App 01/18/2008) In this case, the defendant sought to discover the source code of the Intoxilyzer 5000 so it could be examined for "bugs" or flaws in the code's logic which could result in an incorrect blood alcohol reading. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 3:55 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:51 pm
See Sheehan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:20 am
Lawson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
