Search for: "State v. Cross #1" Results 561 - 580 of 8,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  [1] See David Schleicher, In A Bad State 145-46 (2023).[2] David Schleicher, In A Bad State 145 (2023).[3] 418 U.S. 717 (1974).[4] See Christopher J. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
The DPC also ruled that Meta cannot rely on a derogation under Article 49(1) GDPR for bulk, repetitive and ongoing data transfers (e.g., necessary to perform a contract or in the public interest). [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Stated otherwise, the question of proximate cause is not resolvable on this motion to dismiss (see Schroeder v Pinterest Inc., 133 AD3d 12, 26 n 7 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
IPSO 22013-22 Gibbens v manchestereveningnews.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No Breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 14399-23 Windhow v newsandstar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in open court and apologies An apology was read in open court on 18 May 2023 before HHJ Lewis in the case of Paul Seeley v NGN Ltd QB-2022-002151. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm by Joel R. Brandes
According to Erazo, she and Ortiz had arranged to move their family to the United States, with Erazo and M.S.O. crossing into the United States first, to be followed by Ortiz. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On the same day, a statement was read out in resolution of the defamation case Dinah Rose KC v (1) Jonathan Ames (2) Times Media Ltd KB 2023-000485. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]