Search for: "State v. Cross #2" Results 561 - 580 of 7,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2007, 1:27 pm
  The court rejected "Baldwin's 'had-my-fingers-crossed' argument because what counts is not what she believed about her stated intent but what the decision maker at Blue Cross believed". [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am by Wendy McGuire Coats
  So the United States’ argument hinges on two combined theories: (1) field preemption and (2) facially unconstitutional. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:34 am
For publication opinions today (2): Tamko Roofing Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:56 am by Amanda Pickens
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina; No. 9:17-cv-594 (D.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
According to Justice Ginsburg, the Court’s opinion “disqualifies the class at the starting gate, holding that the plaintiffs cannot cross the ‘commonality’ line set by Rule 23(a)(2). [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Bank of America v. [read post]