Search for: "State v. Epstein" Results 561 - 580 of 686
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Tom Goldstein
  Katyal’s work before the Court was very highly regarded, including his victory in Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:43 am by Amanda Frost
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:58 pm by David Lat
Professor Richard Epstein, who teaches torts, offers some advice for tackling it. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:10 am by David Lat
So how would you react to learning of a three-way debate between Wurtzel, Epstein, and Yoo — in which the dynamic is not La Wurtzel v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
In light of the Court’s decision in Black v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As Richard Epstein explained some years ago in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
In Forbes, law professor Richard Epstein criticizes the McDonald ruling, arguing that “[t]here is, quite simply, no good structural reason why the state cannot limit the right to keep and bear arms if the full text of the Second Amendment is in play. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
“From the beginning of his time as a Justice, you could see Stevens’s roots in the New Deal Court and his willingness to justify an expanding welfare state,” Richard Epstein, a libertarian-leaning law professor at New York University, said. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Ray Dowd
Desmukh, Hedy Epstein, Hector Feliciano, Irving Greenberg, Grace Cohen Grossman, Marcia Sachs Littell, Hubert G. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Michael McCann
Tim Epstein will moderate the panel discussion, with Gabe Feldman and me as the panelists.A webcast of the event is available. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:24 pm by Mike
 Thus, a criminal case reads: People of the State of California v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:03 pm by David Bernstein
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court did, in fact, adhere to a “libertarian philosophy” in one race case, Buchanan v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:04 am by Minnesota Law Review
As a result, he concludes that their defense of Griffin v. [read post]