Search for: "State v. Fields"
Results 561 - 580
of 12,890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2010, 1:14 pm
The Supreme Court of Illinois in The People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
As the court stated in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:45 pm
Sharabani v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:21 am
The states were required to yield to national supremacy (reinforced by Article V’s Supremacy Clause). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
In conclusion, the Appeals Court said, "Although we hold that Congress has indicated its intent to occupy the entire field of aviation safety, the generally applicable state laws and regulations imposing permit requirements on land use challenged here do not, on the facts before us, invade that preempted field. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
The vehicle rolled over into a soybean field. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm
Such "training" is as suspect as field sobriety testing anyway and is really nothing more than an officer's opinion. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:32 am
Gwinnett County, GA, v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court, with respect, picked the wrong case, when it decided State of Kerala v Mar Appraem Kuri on 7 May, 2012. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
Allegations of the defendant attorney’s deceit “must be . stated with particularity. [read post]
WA: State's failure to show how close defendant was to car was a failure of proof on search incident
20 Nov 2008, 6:05 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 5:14 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:55 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
Judicial Watch, the government watchdog group, announced today that its client, the Arizona State Legislature, has been granted permission to intervene as a defendant in the Obama Justice Department lawsuit (USA v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In Waya the Supreme Court introduced the concept of proportionality to the calculation of confiscation orders and in R v Ahmed, R v Fields the Court introduced an extra-statutory rule which prevents multiple co-defendants from each being required to pay an amount equal to a jointly obtained benefit. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
For various reasons, the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on Tuesday in Haywood v. [read post]
