Search for: "State v. Folk"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
So let's hope that good folks of the federal and state benches all have the good sense to stop trying, before this gets out of hand. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
So let's hope that good folks of the federal and state benches all have the good sense to stop trying, before this gets out of hand. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:41 am
California state law makes the unreported additional tax imposed by audit assessable until a point after the state tax folks learn about it. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 am
In the matter of United States V. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:45 am
The case is New Process Steel v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:46 am
The Second Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:58 pm
(Select) Michael V. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
In Crawford, William v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 7:43 am
A question for you con law folks out there: Does anyone think that this lawsuit stands much of a chance, given the Court's holding in Whitman v American Trucking, 531 U.S. 457 (2001)? [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Last year’s decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:28 pm
Watson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:43 pm
Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
A good example is what happened in Gandy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:33 pm
Thanks to this post at DotD, I see that divided panel of the Third Circuit in Doe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which s/he does, reading the relevant CALCRIM instruction.And, of course, the relevant CALCRIM instruction accurately states the law. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
Oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States was held in Florence v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:02 pm
See Piontek v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
Yale hosted CELS V, and the committee did a bang up job: the food was tasty; there were no technical snafus of note; and the panels appeared to have a high degree of internal validity & congruence. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Because the Administration hopes to take shelter in a cryptic 1948 decision, Hirota v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
Giuffre and Humphries v. [read post]
