Search for: "State v. Freedom of Information Commission"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 1:35 pm
The Judgment of the Court was summarized by legal-patent.com.DESIGNIn Turkey, although the Turkish Intellectual Property Code refers to both the degree of freedom of choice and the informed user, in practice it has not always been clear how these concepts are implemented in design disputes. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:54 am
Disclosing the unlisted telephone numbers called by public officials pursuant to a FOIL requestMatter of Hawley v Village of Penn Yan, 35 A.D.3d 1270 This case arose when Robert Hawley submitted a Freedom of Information [FOIL] request to obtain a list of all of the telephone calls made and received by the Mayor of the Village of Penn Yan for a two-month period on a cellular telephone paid for the Village. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Federal Election Commission (Case No. 08-205) [See WIMS 1/22/10]. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
Here I explore Hak v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm
State v Casillas. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
The Commission’s staff will not disclose a whistleblower’s identity in response to requests under the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
Not at all; the information provided by Geist is inaccurate. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
Freedom of Information Information Commissioner Christopher Graham has submitted evidence to Lord Burns’ Independent Commission on Freedom of Information. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 10:28 am
Samson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
Both circumstances, the Court stated, could amount to the ISP’s actual knowledge only in connection with a general obligation actively to monitor and research illegal content, which is explicitly forbidden by Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive, reading that “Member States shall not impose a general obligation on providers … to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:04 pm
The 2003 Supreme Court case Lawrence v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Register at this link.From Yale Law School’s Abrams Institute for Freedom of Speech - The 4th Commercial Speech and Commercial Speech ConferenceCOMMERCIAL SPEECH POST-NIFLA v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
When that day comes, copious reference will no doubt be made to the Class 99 weblog, which has chronicled and commented on numerous "informed user" decisions -- the most recent of which, in Louver-Lite v Harris Parts, you can read here. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The drafting body was known as the Kutak Commission. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:56 am
By: Rachel V. [read post]
