Search for: "State v. GP" Results 561 - 580 of 1,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2015, 7:32 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Other significant increases include reading and responding to e-mail, reading, updating social media accounts and using GPS. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am by INFORRM
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am by Giles Peaker
(Eg R (on the application of) Paul-Coker v London Borough of Southwark [2006] EWHC 497 (Admin) ). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:26 pm
Eugene Volokh has this post at the Volokh Conspiracy highlighting the recent case of State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm by MOTP
AN Luxury Imports, Ltd. d/b/a BMW of 2 Dallas (BMW Dallas), AN Luxury Imports GP, LLC, and United States Warranty Corp. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
AN Luxury Imports, Ltd. d/b/a BMW of 2 Dallas (BMW Dallas), AN Luxury Imports GP, LLC, and United States Warranty Corp. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:17 am by David Markus
That standard worked for a while, but with the development of new technology, it has become very difficultThe first case was “United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm by Ruth Levush
Supreme Court Justice Harlan’s concurring opinion in Katz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:38 pm
Patent No. 8,652,009.These IPR petitions challenge claims concerning GPS, athletic performance tracking, route recommendation and more, on the grounds of anticipation and obviousness. [read post]