Search for: "State v. Gill" Results 561 - 580 of 694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Valentin Vandendaele at Leiden Law Blog describes – and advocates – use of the efficiency gap to measure partisan gerrymandering, which the court declined to do this term in Gill v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm by Betsy McKenzie
In this court case (companion case to Gill v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
A judgment in from the European Court of Human Rights from February 9 on Richard Anderson v U.K, ruled that the absence of effective court case management in Court of Session proceedings failed to meet the right to a fair trial within the terms of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
Specifically, the Court noted that Recital 6 of the Directive states that “member states should also remain free to fix the provisions of procedure surrounding the registration, the revocation and invalidity of trade marks acquired by registration”. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
», signée par Gilles Proulx. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:59 am
 According to an article in the American Family Physician, "although it is found in all coastal waters of the United States, most V. vulnificus infections are attributed to consuming raw oysters harvested in the Gulf of Mexico during the summer. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
”  Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the court could announce today whether it will review a lower court decision holding that Wisconsin’s “redistricting plan violated the Constitution’s First Amendment and equal rights protections because of partisan gerrymandering”; he explains that the case, Gill v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice announces that “I have the opinion in Number 16-1161, Gill v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 5:58 am by Nicholas Espíritu
Another school access case, Plyler v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 240 (1990) (reaffirming this principle as to “prior restraint[s] in advance of a final judicial determination on the merits”); State v. [read post]