Search for: "State v. Givens" Results 561 - 580 of 53,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm by Charles Bolton
Applicants are advised to adhere closely to ODOD’s Economic Impact Statement guidelines for any given application round. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Rightly so.I'm less confident that Justice Wiley is correct when he says "This mental state—requiring only proof that Canales voluntarily inserted his finger or penis into his stepdaughter’s vagina, without any further level of mental culpability—satisfies the presumption of mandatory culpability. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am by INFORRM
The Judge re-stated the need to make allowance for editorial judgment, citing the principles summarised in Banks-v-Cadwalladr [2022] 1 WLR 5236. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Malcolm Birdling
The second prompt is the General Court’s recent decision in Case T-426/21 Nizar Assaad v Council ECLI:EU:T:2023:114. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:15 am by Stephen Bilkis
This means the defendant was acting in an official capacity or using power given to them by the state. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am by Hannah Rigby (Bristows)
This follows his earlier judgment in Teva v Novartis ([2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat)). [read post]