Search for: "State v. Goulding" Results 561 - 580 of 686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2011, 3:29 am
In Gould v Board of Education, 81 NY2d 446, the New York State Court of Appeals held that a “tenured teacher has a protected property [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Employee Stock Options and Mergers and Acquisitions Posted by Ilona Babenko, Arizona State University, on Friday, August 12, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Acquisitions, Bidders, Equity-based compensation, Mergers & acquisitions, Stock options,Takeover premiums, Target firms, Tech companies Stakes Go Up In SEC Administrative Proceedings Posted by Wayne M. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:58 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit issued Wednesday in Khatib v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm by Jerome H. Juday
Supreme Court’s recent decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 1 and May 15 conferences) Gould v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Stern School of Business New York University Ehud Kamar Professor of Law Gould School of Law University of Southern California Naveen Khanna AJ Pasant Endowed Chair Professor of Finance Broad College of Business Michigan State University Vikramaditya S. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To succeed on a motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence must utterly refute the plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Gould v Decolator, 121 AD3d 845, 847; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
 Goulding's Employee Competition,but no mention of Gurry orToulson....Counsel for the claimants cited an extract from Employee Competition (edited by Paul Goulding QC) dealing with interim orders which provided that a respondent should not merely stop using the confidential information, but should destroy all electronic copies of the confidential information remaining on his computer. [read post]