Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Beneficial Corporation,[1] securities class actions have often included options traders alongside purchasers and sellers of stock. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
United States, 279 U.S. 151, 49 S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
As stated in Blue Chip Stamps: “A private damages action under Rule 10b-5 is confined to actual purchasers or sellers of securities. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm
In 1987, the Supreme Court broadly held in McNally v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:44 am
It features the following articles: M Lehmann, “A new piece in the puzzle of locating financial loss: the ruling in VEB v BP on jurisdiction for collective actions based on deficient investor information” For the first time, the CJEU has ruled in VEB v BP on the court competent for deciding liability suits regarding misinformation on the secondary securities market. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:12 am
V. [read post]
29 May 2025, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] The SEC was not alone in bringing these enforcement actions – multiple state securities regulators brought similar enforcement actions in June 2023, and they remain pending in five states. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am
” Finally, in a March 18, 2015 press release (here) the company announced the resignation of the three SQM board member designees of the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Wayne R. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 3:47 pm
In Sugarman v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
The trustees and proxies run the cleared company independently, and are subject to the foreign owners’ control only in relation to the following “life or death” corporate decisions: (i) the sale or disposal of all or a substantial part of the company’s assets, (ii) pledges, mortgages, or encumbrances on the capital stock, (iii) corporate mergers, consolidations, or reorganizations, (iv) dissolution, or (v) a declaration of bankruptcy. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
The trustees and proxies run the cleared company independently, and are subject to the foreign owners’ control only in relation to the following “life or death” corporate decisions: (i) the sale or disposal of all or a substantial part of the company’s assets, (ii) pledges, mortgages, or encumbrances on the capital stock, (iii) corporate mergers, consolidations, or reorganizations, (iv) dissolution, or (v) a declaration of bankruptcy. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:29 pm
In Rahimi v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, expanded the protections offered to whistleblowers under anti-fraud laws, in Lawson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:57 am
The investors lost substantially all of their investment. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:02 am
S.A. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:33 am
Dudenhoeffer (U.S. 2014), the Supreme Court established pleading requirements for an investor to state a claim for breach of the duty of prudence against a fiduciary of an employee stock ownership plan. [read post]
Delaware Chancery Court Enjoins Stockholder Vote For Lack Of Adequate Disclosures In Proxy Statement
21 Jun 2010, 1:20 pm
In Maric Capital Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am
Few pieces of wide-ranging legislation come together so quickly as did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but when Congress senses a felt need, it can move with surprising speed.The SEC Historical Society today presented a panel titled The Sarbanes-Oxley Act at 20: A Corporate Governance Legacy featuring many of the key players at the SEC who implemented the Congressional mandate on corporate governance meant to reassure investors that public company financial statements could again… [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
In Newman, however, the Second Circuit was faced with a corporate insider (an investor relations employee) who shared information with an analyst at an institutional investor. [read post]
