Search for: "State v. J. D. C." Results 561 - 580 of 3,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2021, 11:09 am by David Reiss
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a mixed decision for Fannie & Freddie shareholders in  Bhatti v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Quantum computing; b. artificial intelligence; c. precision medicine; d. diagnostic methods; e. pharmaceutical treatments; and f. other computer-related inventions (e.g. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm by News Desk
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CORVALLIS, OREGON BriefFull CLOSING THE GAPS: FOOD SAFETY EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TO UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES IN THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY 2021 2021 2021-05668 Yemmireddy, V. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
–––Jasmine D.], 165 A.D.3d 476, 85 N.Y.S.3d 430 [1st Dept. 2018]). [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The U.S. appointed Julie Bédard and Canada named Mark C. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
The Trump administration implemented MPP by utilizing the “contiguous territory return” provision in Section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) in a way that it had never been used before. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
In a prior ruling, the court held that Craigslist qualified for Section 230(c)(1) protection for state law claims but not for the 1595 claim. [read post]
In relation to section 15(1)(b), on established principles of property law, Beach J stated that Dr Thaler is the owner of the invention as the owner, programmer and operator of DABUS. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
Some detriment must thereby have been suffered by C, or benefit accrued to D, sufficient to make it unconscionable for D to assert the true legal or factual position. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
A key element of the tariff question is the meaning of Section 68.2(1) of the Copyright Act which states: 68.2 (1) Without prejudice to any other remedies available to it, a collective society may, for the period specified in its approved tariff, collect the royalties specified in the tariff and, in default of their payment, recover them in a court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]