Search for: "State v. J. N." Results 561 - 580 of 4,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2019, 10:31 pm
This is exactly the question that was addressed in a recent opinion by the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Schnitzel, Inc. dba R&J Jewelry & Loan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:22 pm
ACM 36988, slip op. at 4-5 (Jackson, J., concurring in part/dissenting in part) (citing State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Gathers, 490 U.S. 805, 824 (1989) (Scalia, J., dissenting). [13] Stout, supra note 2, at 168. [14] Thompson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
Two examples within the last year, both striking down agency actions, stand out: In Alabama Ass’n of Realtors v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARTIN J. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
US District Court, 503 U.S. 653, 656 & n. 7 (1992) (Stevens, J., dissenting). [read post]